Legal Opinion

Hanzy v. Landry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1970No. 4181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNETTE, Judge.

This workmen’s compensation case is before us in response to a writ of certio-rari directed to the trial judge. The question to be determined is the correctness of the trial judge’s refusal to grant the plaintiff’s request for a preliminary judgment under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 23:1316.

The plaintiff, Marion Hanzy, divorced wife of Milford Dolloile, filed suit against the defendant, Donald Landry, doing business as Charlie’s Place, on August 27, 1969, seeking recovery of workmen’s compensation benefits. The substance of her complaint is that she sustained an injury to her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duplechien v. States Exploration CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Fontenot v. Great American Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Hollinsworth v. Crossett Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dupre v. LA RETAILERS ASS'N SELF-INSURERSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Kidder v. Power Rig Drilling Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Pearson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Romero v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API