Legal Opinion

Cabasug v. Crane Co.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 25, 2013No. Civil No. 12-00313 JMS/BMKPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO APPLY THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW OF HAWAII, DOC. NO. 406

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On June 1, 2012, Plaintiffs Robert and Joyce Cabasug (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action asserting claims for negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, loss of consortium, and punitive damages against twenty-five Defendants that manufactured, sold and/or supplied various products containing asbestos to the United States Navy. As alleged in the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Robert Cabasug (“Cabasug”) was exposed to asbestos contained in Defendants’…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cabasug v. Crane Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  2. Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. Cabasug v. Crane Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  4. Holder v. Fraser Shipyards, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  5. Genusa v. Asbestos Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API