Legal Opinion

Ryan v. GAF Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

Owens-Coming Fiberglas Corporation (“OCF”) appeals from an order which denied its motion for post-trial relief. For the reasons which follow, we quash the appeal.

The procedural history of this case can be summarized as follows. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, *172Inc.1 Post-verdict motions were filed, but the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, without first disposing of these motions. Both OCF and Owens-Illinois appealed. On appeal, this Court vacated the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Bonavitacola v. CluverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Ryan v. Gaf Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Com. v. Wongus, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API