Legal Opinion

DeWolfe v. Richmond

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 4, 2012No. 34PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

When an individual is arrested, he or she must go before a judicial officer for an initial appearance, pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-213(a). The judicial officer, who in all instances relevant to the matter sub judice is a District Court Commissioner (“Commissioner”)1, has a number of duties at the initial appearance, among which is to comply with the pretrial release provisions of Maryland Rule 4-216. That rule requires the Commissioner to determine whether there was probable cause for the arrest and, if so, whether the defendant should *409be released on his or her own recognizance, on bail, or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Rothgery v. Gillespie CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wynne v. Comptroller of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. DeWolfe v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Smallwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Smallwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API