Frost v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
After Yvonne Frost, an injured worker, collected workers’ compensation benefits and then recovered underinsured motorist benefits from a third party, the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) sought reimbursement for benefits it had paid to Frost. The trial court found that the Department was not entitled to reimbursement under RCW 51.24.030(4) because Frost, rather than her employer, Ticor Title Insurance Company, owned the automobile insurance policy. Based on evidence that Ticor was the named insured on the policy and paid the policy premiums, we conclude that the evidence is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clark v. PacificorpWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Price v. Farmers Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Price v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Clauson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Hildahl v. BringolfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Hildahl v. BringolfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Bermel v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012