Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 18, 1903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Case 95 — Prosecution Against A. P. Taylor, for Embezzlement. — * APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT-WATTS PARKER, CIRCUIT JUDGE. Defendant Convicted and Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the court by

JUDGE O’REAR

Reversing.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a verdict and judgment convicting and sentencing him under a charge of embezzlement. He and four others, in May, 1900, organized, as corporators, the Industrial Mutual Investment Company. Its authorized capital stock was $5,000, of which each one of the incorporators subscribed $1,000. They then paid in on their several subscriptions the sums of $50 each, executing their notes to the company for the balance. Whether *734they ever actually paid any of this balance is not perfectly clear, although they claim that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. McKnight V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  3. United States v. HarperUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  4. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. United States v. YoutseyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. McGarveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. State v. KornegaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. GlazeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Queen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API