Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Shipp

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1891No. 14,966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, C. J.

This action was brought in the court below by the appellees against the appellant, to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure the payment of two promissory notes. The first alleged error discussed is the overruling of a motion by the appellant to quash the summons,, for the reason that the Christian names of two of the appellees, plaintiffs below, were not given in full in the summons. The plaintiffs’ names were set out in full in the-complaint, but in the summons the plaintiffs were designated as J. V. Shipp, M. A. Chester, and Jane Morrison. The motion to quash was overruled, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wolfe v. PughIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Dunkle v. ElstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Heberd v. WinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. RookerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. KidderIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Duzan v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Brown v. GuyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Russ v. RussIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Everitt, Seedsman v. BasslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API