Legal Opinion

Russ v. Russ

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1895No. 17,497PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellees sued the appellant in the St. Joseph Circuit Court, to enjoin him from wrongfully-using a trade-mark and trade names belonging to the appellees by purchase from the former firm of S-. A. Russ Co., known as S. A. Russ’ Bleaching Blue, and to recover damages for such wrongful use. The issues *472joined we.re tried by tbe court, resulting in a general finding, judgment for $300.00 and a perpetual injunction pursuant to the prayer of the complaint over appellant’s motion for a new trial and to modify the decree of injunction. Error is assigned on the action of the court in overruling…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Stone v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hamrick v. LoringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Patterson v. State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Roney v. RodgersIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API