Ulrich's Case
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 224, Jan. T., 1920, by Joseph Ulrich, from decree of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1919, No. 4908, declaring his wife a feme sole trader in the case of Petition of Marie Louise Mallet Ulrich. Petition to declare a woman a feme sole trader. Before Martin, P. J. The court granted the prayer of the petition. Respondent appealed. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Frazer,
Marie Ulrich presented a petition to the Court of Common Pleas, No. 5, of Philadelphia County, alleging her husband, Joseph Ulrich, had wilfully, maliciously and without reasonable cause, deserted her and made no provision for the support of herself and two minor children and asking that she be decreed a feme sole trader. Her husband in an answer denied deserting his wife without reasonable cause and averred he was driven from his home by the indignities and cruelty to him on the part of his wife and that he left her in possession of a business he formerly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- York Water Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Brown v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- King v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
- Canole v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. FrickeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Walker's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Huffman v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Garr v. FulsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Nyce v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Hargis v. MoxonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.