Legal Opinion

Kessell v. Bridewell

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided March 23, 1994No. 10-94-030-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

In this mandamus proceeding, we must decide (1) whether non-parties asserting their rights of privacy in documents that are otherwise discoverable have standing to seek mandamus review of an adverse order and (2) whether the employees of an insurance company have established their privacy interests in their employer’s “performance-evaluation records” to an extent sufficient to prevent disclosure to the plaintiffs in a bad-faith suit. Because we find that the employees have standing but have not established their privacy interests in the records in question, we deny the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. in Re Sun Coast Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  3. Humphreys v. Caldwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. In Re Crestcare Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  5. In Re Maurer, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API