Legal Opinion

Rand v. Eyemart Express LLC

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 1, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00621Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RACHELLE RAND, ET AL., § § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:24-CV-000621-N § EYEMART EXPRESS, LLC, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This Order addresses Defendant Eyemart Express, LLC’s (“Eyemart”) motion to dismiss [14]. Because Plaintiffs Rachelle Rand, Esperanza Gottschau, and Ramon Soto have failed to plead facts sufficient to state a claim for violation of the Federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), the Missouri Wiretap Act, or the Illinois Eavesdropping Statute (“IES”),…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API