Rand v. Eyemart Express LLC
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RACHELLE RAND, ET AL., § § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:24-CV-000621-N § EYEMART EXPRESS, LLC, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This Order addresses Defendant Eyemart Express, LLC’s (“Eyemart”) motion to dismiss [14]. Because Plaintiffs Rachelle Rand, Esperanza Gottschau, and Ramon Soto have failed to plead facts sufficient to state a claim for violation of the Federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), the Missouri Wiretap Act, or the Illinois Eavesdropping Statute (“IES”),…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.