Burns v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TATUM, Judge.
The appellant, Frederick Burns, seeks reversal of four convictions for passing forged instruments over the value of $100. He assigns no error relating to the sufficiency of the evidence, conduct of the trial, or punishments; but rather to the court’s refusal to dismiss the presentments with prejudice on the ground that the State failed to prosecute the charges within the time limit set by the Interstate Compact on Detainers (T.C.A. § 40-3901 et seq.). 1 He also assigns error that he was not granted a speedy trial. We reverse the convictions and dismiss the presentments.
We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- People v. Esposito, New York County Courts1960
- Nelms v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Rockmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- People v. MasselliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
3Cited by18 opinions
- Narel v. LiburdiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. MartensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- State v. BarefieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Odhinn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.