Legal Opinion
Narel v. Liburdi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1981PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
This case involves the relationship of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, General Statutes §§ 54-157 through 54-185, and the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, General Statutes §§ 54-186 through 54-192. The precise question presented by this appeal is whether, if we assume that the plaintiff has properly invoked his rights under the agreement on detainers, the failure of the charging state to bring him to trial within the time limit prescribed by the detainer agreement precludes that state from invoking the provisions of the extradition act. The short answer to that question is “no.”
In…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sweeney v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for WomenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.