Legal Opinion
In Re Wellhofer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 19, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEastwood, J.
On April 2d, 1948, a rule to show cause was made, upon the application of thirty-four freeholders, why a summary investigation of the affairs of the Oity of Atlantic City, pursuant to the provisions of R. S. 40:6 — 1, et seq:, should not be directed. On April 21st and 22d, 1948, counsel for the city presented voluminous affidavits in answer to those presented by applicants. Subsequently,. I allowed further .time for counsel to obtain and submit additional affidavits and briefs. The proofs and briefs of the parties have been given careful and thorough consideration.
A concise statement and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mayor of Hoboken v. O'NeillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- In Re a Summary Investigation Into the Affairs of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Dallas v. City of Sea Isle CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- In Re NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders for an Investigation of the Office of SheriffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Appeal of Tp. of MonroeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- In Re Application of WellhoferNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- In Re Application of WellhoferNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951