Legal Opinion

In Re the Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders for an Investigation of the Office of Sheriff

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 6, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal, on certification granted, 94 N.J. 587 (1983), calls for interpretation of N.J.S.A. 40A:5-22, a section of the Local Fiscal Affairs Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:5-1 to -42, that has been on the books in one form or another for over a century. See North Bergen Township v. Gough, 107 N.J.L. 424, 427 (Sup.Ct.1931). In its current form the statute permits a judge of the Superior Court, in his discretion and in response to a petition of twenty-five taxpayers or a resolution of the governing body, to make a summary investigation into the affairs of any local unit.

The Burlington County Board of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Avant v. CliffordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. CaffieroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Dunne v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Ross v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  5. State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AbbatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. United States v. D'AlessioDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. Pickett v. HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. Cupano v. GluckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Clorox Products Manufacturing Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API