Legal Opinion
Gallo v. Gallo
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1916No. Civ. No. 1513PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts -are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLISON, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action to quiet her title to the northeast quarter of a certain section of land situated in Tulare County, and obtained judgment -as prayed for. The defendant appeals.
On the trial the plaintiff introduced as evidence of her title to the quarter-section a patent from the United States to her husband, Giacomo Gallo, dated August 9, 1897, and a deed from the latter to her, of August 12, 1911, conveying the land.
The defendant (who' is a brother of said Giacomo Gallo) as a defense alleged that he had obtained title to the land by adverse possession, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty v. KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Glowner v. De AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGrail v. FieldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Myran v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bowen v. OlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Aggelos v. Zella Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1940