Legal Opinion

Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin County

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1996No. Civil No. 4-94-63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*350ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Hennepin County”) to stay enforcement of certain aspects of the permanent injunction entered in this action and to stay further proceedings pending appeal. Plaintiffs oppose these motions.

A. Stay of Permanent Injunction

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 62(c), the court may “suspend, modify, restore, or grant an injunction during the pendency of the appeal on terms as to bond or otherwise as it considers proper for the security of the rights of the adverse party.” The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of ClarkstownSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. City of Saint PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  2. Worth v. HarringtonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API