Legal Opinion
Munson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 24, 1998No. 97-AA-778PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
“The definition of the term ‘employee’ ... has probably produced more reported cases than any definition of status in the modern history of law.” 3 Arthur LaRSON, Laeson’s WORKERS’ Compensation Law § 43.10, at 8-1 (1998). Petitioner Kevin Munson challenges a compensation order of a hearing examiner denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits on the ground that Munson was not an “employee” of Hardy & Son Trucking Co. (“Hardy”). We vacate the order and remand the case to the Director of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Coumaris v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Henderson v. Charles E. Smith Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rafferty v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- USA Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. LoveDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Reyes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Kirkpatrick v. District of Columbia Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fred F. Blanken & Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Clark Construction Group, LLC v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.