Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FICKLING, Associate Judge:
This appeal 1 challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a decision of the District Unemployment Compensation Board (Board) disqualifying petitioner from unemployment benefits because he had been discharged from his most recent employment for misconduct. 2 After a careful review of the entire record and authorities cited, we hold that the evidence was sufficient and, therefore, we affirm.
The evidence before the Board can be summarized as follows. Petitioner was employed as a loading platform supervisor for Lansburgh’s Department Store. One of his duties…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Samuel Jacobowitz v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hockaday v. D. C. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.