State v. Bluehorse
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.
¶1 — Timothy Bluehorse appeals his conviction for drive-by shooting and his exceptional sentence based on a gang aggravator.1 Bluehorse contends that (1) the trial court erred in failing to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting his exceptional sentence, (2) the record does not support the jury’s finding of a gang aggravator, (3) the trial court’s reasons for imposing an exceptional sentence were not substantial and compelling because they violated the real facts doctrine,2 and (4) the exceptional sentence was clearly excessive. In his statement of additional grounds…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. AbuanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. AbuanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. DeLeonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.