Legal Opinion

Maynard v. BTI Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 2013No. A136093PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

We here confront the recurring issue of determining the prevailing party for the purpose of awarding attorney fees under a contractual attorney fee provision. Defendant BTI Group, Inc. (BTI), appeals a postjudgment order denying its motion for attorney fees, contending that although it was held liable for damages to plaintiff, Catherine Maynard, under her cause of action for negligence, it was nonetheless the prevailing party entitled to attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717 (section 1717) because plaintiff did not recover under her cause of action for breach of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. David Tompkins v. 23andme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Asphalt Prof'ls Inc. v. Davis (In re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2019
  5. David Tompkins v. 23andme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API