Legal Opinion
Egan v. Crowther
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 1925No. Docket No. 5007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover a judgment for moneys alleged to be due and owing to the plaintiff pursuant to the terms of an oral contract. The defendant appeared and filed an answer denying the material averments of the complaint and pleading an accord and satisfaction. Judgment went for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.
In August, 1922, the defendant bought for the plaintiff a lot of hay from one Scott. It was estimated that the lot ■contained 500 tons; but later it transpired that the quantity had been overestimated. The plaintiff informed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Ward v. . PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Whittaker Chain Tread Co. v. Standard Auto Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Whittier v. StegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Southern California Disinfecting Co. v. LomkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- D. E. Sanford Co. v. Cory Glass Coffee Brewer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Evans v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- MacIsaac & Menke Co. v. Cardox Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.