Legal Opinion
Wayne Kunz Olive Kunz Glenn v. Turner Carol Turner v. Utah Power & Light Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1989No. 87-4361PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Various landowners (“Landowners”) brought suit against the Utah Power & Light Company (“Utah Power”) for damages to real and personal property caused by flooding waters that were discharged from a lake used as a water storage system by Utah Power. The district court dismissed all of the Landowners’ theories of liability except for the negligence theory. In a special verdict, the jury found that Utah Power was not negligent and the court entered judgment for Utah Power. On appeal, Landowners contend that the court below erred in dismissing its alternative theories of liability. We certify…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Burt v. Farmers' Co-Operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Klaus Meckert v. Transamerica Insurance Company, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Stephenson v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Fischer v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
- Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Wayne Kunz Olive Kunz Glenn v. Turner Carol Turner v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.