Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1966No. Civ. 11076PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Acting P. J.
In this declaratory relief action plaintiff St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company is a truck liability insurer which seeks to impose coverage on two other truck insurance carriers under the “loading and unloading” clauses of the others’ policies. The suit was submitted for decision on an agreed statement of facts supplemented by additional evidence. There is no factual dispute.
The array of parties to the accident, policyholding employers and insurance carriers is as follows: A. Teiehert & Son, Inc., a general contractor, The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, its insurer; Herbert…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Pacific Automobile Ins. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Columbia Southern Chemical Corp. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- National Indemnity Co. v. CorboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. AETNA INS. CO. OF HARTFORDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.