Legal Opinion

People v. Aaron J. (In re Aaron J.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 1, 2018No. A145253; A145890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

*1041In this juvenile appeal, we consider the appropriate procedure for determining-in accordance with section 241.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code1 -whether a juvenile who appears to come within the description of both section 300 and section 602 should be treated as a dependent or a ward. After Aaron J. (appellant) was declared a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to section 602, he appealed claiming a host of errors primarily focused on the juvenile court's decision to make him a ward rather than retain his status as a dependent minor. Specifically, appellant asserts that the county…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re J.O. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. People v. Amador CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Dean CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Kruckenberg CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API