Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 23, 2024No. 3:15-cv-05128Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RAEF LAWSON, Case No. 15-cv-05128-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S STANDING 9 v. TO PURSUE PAGA PENALTIES AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE OF 10 GRUBHUB, INC., et al., PROPOSITION 22 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 369, 371 12 13 Raef Lawson brings a representative PAGA claim alleging Grubhub unlawfully classified 14 its food delivery drivers as independent contractors and as a result failed to reimburse them for 15 necessary expenses, pay them minimum wage, and pay them overtime wages. (Dkt. No. 41 ¶ 33.)1 16 Following oral…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API