Legal Opinion
Quigley v. Rosenthal
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 17, 2005No. 04-1501PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs William and Dorothy Quigley appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for attorneys’ fees and nontaxable litigation costs. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
I
The underlying factual and procedural history of this civil action is detailed in Quigley v. Rosenthal, 327 F.3d 1044 (10th Cir.2003), and will not be repeated here. In sum, the Quigleys filed suit in federal court against defendants the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Saul Rosenthal, the director of the ADL’s Denver office, asserting various claims under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Esposito v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Essence, Inc. v. City of Federal HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, Accidental Death & Dismemberment & Dependent Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Perez v. El Tequila, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Debord v. Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.