Scrivener v. Dietz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
-This is an action against C. M. Grant, mortgagor, and other defendants, alleged claimants of subsequent liens upon the mortgage property, for the *2recovery of - judgment against the mortgagor, and the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage given by him on the 22d of December, 1875, to the London and San Francisco Bank, Limited, to secure payment of an indebtedness of five thousand dollars and interest, and such other sums, with interest, as the said bank might advance to the said -Grant after the date of the mortgage.
Of the defendants, Grant made default, and the defendants Dietz, McAfee, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rankin v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Porter v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Harvey v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Wilke v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hawley v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Head v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bailey v. Aetna Indemnity Co., of HartfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Horkey v. KendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Hilbish v. AsadaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.