Rogers v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
Anthony Rogers appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in favor of Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. (“Penske”), and Terry Wallace in Rogers’s malicious-prosecution action. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm that judgment.
The record discloses the following facts that are relevant to this appeal. In keeping with our standard of review discussed herein, we present these facts in the light most favorable to Rogers. Penske is a nationwide company that, among other things, leases vehicles ranging from tractor-trailers to vans. Penske’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- American Liberty Insurance Co. v. Amsouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Eidson v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- S.S. Kresge Co. v. RubySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rogers v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Bekken v. Greystone Residential Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Hobbs v. HeiseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Casey v. CaseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- E.S.R. v. Y.L.T.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014