Osterberg v. Peca
Texas Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceJustice Gonzales
I withdraw my July 29, 1999 concurring opinion and substitute the following.
I agree with the Court that the Texas Election Code’s direct-campaign-expenditure disclosure requirements, with the exception of the in-concert provision, survive the Osterbergs’ specific constitutional challenges. This Court appropriately rejects the Osterbergs’ argument that the Election Code’s approach to regulation — which begins with a rule generally forbidding direct campaign expenditures but makes that rule subject to specified exceptions— is facially unconstitutional.
*57The Court also correctly concludes that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.