Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Osterberg v. Peca

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2000No. 97-1027Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Gonzales

I withdraw my July 29, 1999 concurring opinion and substitute the following.

I agree with the Court that the Texas Election Code’s direct-campaign-expenditure disclosure requirements, with the exception of the in-concert provision, survive the Osterbergs’ specific constitutional challenges. This Court appropriately rejects the Osterbergs’ argument that the Election Code’s approach to regulation — which begins with a rule generally forbidding direct campaign expenditures but makes that rule subject to specified exceptions— is facially unconstitutional.

*57The Court also correctly concludes that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API