Legal Opinion

D'Ambrosia v. Acme Packing & Provision Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1934No. 25205. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

By this action, the plaintiff sought in-junctive relief, and also damages. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to relief in both of the respects demanded. From the judgment entered granting an injunction and awarding damages to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred sixty .dollars, the defendant appeals.

The respondent, C. d’Ambrosia, owns two tracts of land, which is market garden land, a short distance south of the city of Seattle, in the Duwamish river valley. One tract comprises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ingersoll v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Brazell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Humphrey v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Tope v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. City of Seattle v. Monsanto Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  4. Ferrer Vda. de Lugo v. VarelaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
  5. Feeley v. ER Butterworth & SonsWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API