Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Arnold

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 12320PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant husband from an order granting temporary allowance during the pendency of an action for separate maintenance and support and awarding costs and attorney’s fees.

After setting forth the necessary jurisdictional fact of residence the complaint alleges that the appellant has refused to live with respondent and for more than a year last past has failed, neglected and refused to support her. The parties were married in the state of New York in 1917, and appellant is alleged to have deserted respondent in 1918. No community property is involved and there is no issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mudd v. MuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Turner v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Andrade v. NewhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API