Rich v. R.L. Casey, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. After careful review of the record and briefs, we affirm.
We note initially that this appeal is interlocutory since plaintiff amended his complaint on 10 November 1993 to include as a defendant, Guy M. Turner, Inc. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendant but the claims against defendant Turner were not decided. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b) deals with judgments involving multiple claims or parties. Under Rule 54(b), a judgment that is final as to one or more of the parties or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zocco v. United States, Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
- North Carolina Railroad v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. ARL, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Robertson v. Hagood Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Putman v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Spivey v. Wright's RoofingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Boone v. VinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.