Legal Opinion

Putman v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 2009No. COA08-306, COA08-332PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

Majestic Mountain Construction, Inc. and Marsha Patterson-Jones (collectively “defendants”) appeal from Opinions and Awards by the North Carolina Industrial Commission (“Commission”) (1) awarding disability benefits, medical expenses, and attorney’s fees and costs to Michael Dewayne Putman and Darrell Thompson (collectively “plaintiffs”) and (2) assessing additional civil penalties against defendant Marsha Patterson-Jones. We affirm each of the Commission’s awards.

While defendants have maintained separate appeals, both appeals involve common questions of law, as evidenced…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Seagraves v. Austin Co. of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Adams v. AVX CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Point S. Props., LLC v. Cape Fear Pub. Util. Auth.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Soder v. Corvel Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. Parker Home Care, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. CB WindsweptCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API