Legal Opinion

Boone v. Vinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1997No. COA96-1440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Summary judgment is appropriate if a defending party can establish that no claim for relief exists or that the claimant cannot over come an affirmative defense or legal bar to the claim. Wilder v. Hobson, 101 N.C. App. 199, 201, 398 S.E.2d 625, 627 (1990). In addition, when the only issues to be decided are issues of law, summary judgment is proper. Brawley v. Brawley, 87 N.C. App. 545, 548, 361 S.E.2d 759, 761 (1987), disc. review denied, 321 N.C. 471, 364 S.E.2d 918 (1988).

An injured person is entitled to compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Act (hereinafter the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Wilder v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Rich v. R.L. Casey, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Doud v. K & G JANITORIAL SERVICESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Southerland v. B v. Hedrick Gravel & Sand Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Williams v. ARL, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Davis v. TAYLOR-WILKES HELICOPTER SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Reynolds v. M&M CONTRACTINGCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API