Legal Opinion

Blum v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 2, 1981No. 463-80CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This military pay case comes before us now, without oral argument, on defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim within the jurisdiction of this court. The pro se plaintiff has not filed a response to defendant’s motion. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Government’s motion to dismiss without prejudice to the defendant’s filing of a motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff Albert Blum was voluntarily retired from service in the Army in 1976. At that time, he requested, but was denied, a determination of the percentage of his disability to perform military…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Louis G. Ruderer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Ray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Carlisle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. French v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API