Blum v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
This military pay case comes before us now, without oral argument, on defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim within the jurisdiction of this court. The pro se plaintiff has not filed a response to defendant’s motion. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Government’s motion to dismiss without prejudice to the defendant’s filing of a motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff Albert Blum was voluntarily retired from service in the Army in 1976. At that time, he requested, but was denied, a determination of the percentage of his disability to perform military…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Louis G. Ruderer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Ray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Carlisle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- French v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.