Legal Opinion
Young v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 19, 2004No. 02-1368CPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
Defendant has moved to dismiss this ease, under Title 28, Section 1500-the provision that shuts the door to this Court’s jurisdiction when a sufficiently similar suit against the United States government is pending in another court at the time litigants bring their case to our doorstep. The application of this statute is usually pretty straightforward-the Court looks to see what was pending elsewhere and compares that matter to the controversy brought before it. But this usual “what did they file, and when did they file it?” exercise is complicated in this case…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Pellegrini v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.