Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Diversey Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1999No. 1971523PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court of Civil Appeals reversed a summary judgment in favor of the defendant Diversey Corporation in Harriett Cooper's action brought under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine ("AEMLD"). In doing so, the Court of Civil Appeals considered expert testimony submitted by Cooper in support of her opposition to Diversey's motion for summary judgment. See Cooper v. Diversey Corp., [Ms. 2961418, April 10, 1998] 742 So.2d 1244 (Ala.Civ.App. 1998). We reverse and remand.

The principles of law applicable to a motion for summary judgment are well settled. To grant such a motion, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Elba Gen. Hosp. and Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Kyser v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Sanders v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Howard v. Andy's Store for MenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. Smith v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API