Hardesty v. Hamburg Township

OPINION AND ORDER. FEIKENS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ claims against all Defendants are all based on an alleged violation of Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights when the police officer Defendants conducted a war- rantless search of Plaintiffs’ home. Plaintiffs have made a Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendants have made their own motions to dismiss or for summary judgment. I GRANT Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment on all counts, because I find that no such constitutional violation occurred and even if the police officers violated Plaintiffs’ rights, qualified immunity immunizes the…