Legal Opinion

National Sanitary Rag Co. v. Lawrence

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1939No. Civ. 10839PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This appeal pertains to the number of peremptory challenges that may be interposed against prospective jurors who have passed the qualification examination for cause. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 601.)

The action originally was one for declaratory relief to determine the rights of the respective parties to certain United States customs duty refunds. The plaintiff named as defendants Lawrence and Tuttle individually and as copartners, and Geo. W. Reed & Co., a corporation. The defendants Lawrence and Tuttle individually and as copartners filed an answer, and as copartners cross-complained against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Switzler v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Rutland v. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lebak v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wilson v. CerettiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API