Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Ceretti

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 19, 1973No. 55948PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINGS, Justice.

This appeal by plaintiff stems from limitations imposed in a civil action upon voir dire of prospective jurors, jury selection, and related remarks by trial judge. We affirm.

Pursuant to provisions of The Code 1971, Section 123.95, commonly known as the Iowa Dram Shop Act, plaintiff seeks recovery of damages from three defendant liquor licensees. Trial resulted in directed verdicts for two defendants and a jury verdict for the other. During voir dire of prospective jurors plaintiff’s counsel undertook to ascertain the nature of verdicts returned by juries in prior cases on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tamburello v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. State v. GradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Sun Cab Co. v. WalstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Moran v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State v. O'KELLYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. State v. MuetzeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Blades v. DaFoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API