Legal Opinion

Realty Revenue Corp. v. Wilson

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of a multiple dwelling of a kind which is required by section 248 of the Multiple Dwelling Law to be equipped ipth a sprinkler system and an interior fire-alarm system. Because such systems have not been supplied, defendant, the Commissioner of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, has issued an order requiring that the building be vacated. Plaintiff asserts that, because of regulations of Federal agencies respecting the use of materials necessary for the prosecution of the war, it is prevented from obtaining the materials necessary to enable it to install the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Municipal Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation v. TIG Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. City of Winston-Salem v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. People v. ParkerNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1955
  4. City of San Diego v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Benzow v. CooleyNew York Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API