Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. Van Winkle

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1945No. Civ. 3351PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from that portion of a judgment which, during the present war emergency and present housing shortage in La Jolla in the city of San Diego suspended the enforcement of its provisions which “forever enjoined (defendants) from using, occupying or permitting any person to use or occupy the real property and dwelling described in plaintiff’s complaint as a duplex or two-family dwelling, or for any use or purpose not permitted in an ‘R-l Zone’ under the terms of the Ordinance of the City of San Diego. ’ ’

Defendants are the owners of the real property in question located in La…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Donovan v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Plum v. City of HealdsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Judson v. HerringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API