Legal Opinion
State v. Houser
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1990No. 89-1220PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.
This is an appeal brought by the State through the county attorney for Douglas County for review by a single judge of this court, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-116 (Reissue 1989), of certain rulings of the trial court in suppressing statements made by the defendant.
In determining the correctness of a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, the Supreme Court will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless those findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Juhl, ante p. 33, 449 N.W.2d 202 (1989). In determining whether a trial court’s findings on a motion to suppress are clearly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Sturzenegger v. FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS'HOMENebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Mathes v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998