Continental Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, Acting P. J.
This petition challenges denial of a motion for summary judgment. By the motion, Continental Insurance Company sought a ruling that the complaint against it was barred by the one-year limitation period in its insurance contract. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that “the date from which contracted one year requirement to sue begins is [a] factual issue.” Without reaching the merits of the trial court’s ruling, we vacate the court order for failure to comply with a recent amendment to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c.
Section 437c, as the result of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Laible v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ordway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Gonzales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Yuzon v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Tera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.