Legal Opinion

Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1993No. A057731PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. (Avis), is being sued by a motorist injured when her car was rammed by a stolen Avis vehicle being chased from the scene of a shoplifting. Avis’s liability is premised upon its failure to take adequate precautions to prevent theft of its vehicles. We conclude that the “special circumstances” doctrine arising from the California Supreme Court decision in Richards v. Stanley (1954) 43 Cal.2d 60, 65-66 [271 P.2d 23], the only plausible basis for Avis’s liability, does not stretch this far. We order issuance of a writ of mandate to compel the superior…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Cruz v. Middlekauff Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carrera v. Maurice J. Sopp & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Steinle v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. McGee v. City of Laguna BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API