Legal Opinion
Laible v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 1984No. A025973PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Plaintiff, once arrested as a suspect in the robbery of a Brinks truck, challenges a ruling on partial summary judgment establishing the City and County of San Francisco’s (City and County) immunity defense to a cause of action for false arrest and imprisonment. The City and County’s defense depends upon Civil Code section 43.5(a), which states: “There shall be no liability on the part of and no cause of action shall arise against any peace officer who makes an arrest pursuant to a warrant of arrest regular upon its face if such peace officer in making the arrest acts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- LaRosa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Nazaroff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Jackson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- McKay v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ronald E. Ting v. United States of America the Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Internal Revenue Service Joe SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Beck v. City of UplandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- O'TOOLE v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Randle v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.