Legal Opinion
Burgess v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 2001No. 95-CF-1816, 96-CF-247, 98-CO-896PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge.
Isaac Burgess and James Waddell were indicted for first degree premeditated murder while armed, see D.C.Code §§ 22-2401, -3202 (1996 Repl.), assault with intent to kill (AWIK) while armed, see D.C.Code §§ 22-501, -3202 (1996 Repl.), possession of a firearm during a crime of violence (PFCV), see D.C.Code § 22-3204(b) (1996 Repl.), and carrying a pistol without a license (CPWL), see D.C.Code § 22-3204(a) (1996 Repl.). Albert Qui-overs was also named a defendant; he entered a plea to a lesser-included conspiracy charge and testified for the government at appellants’ trial.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kidd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.