Kidd v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Donte J. Kidd, challenges his conviction on the charge of first-degree premeditated murder while armed. 1 He mainly contends that the trial court’s erroneous aiding and abetting jury instruction violated his constitutional due process right, because under our decision in Wilson-Bey v. United States, 903 A.2d 818 (D.C.2006) (en banc), 2 and other cases, the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the mens rea element of the mur der charge; that is, the government must prove premeditation, deliberation, and the specific intent to kill in an aiding…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lowery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Castillo-Campos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Little v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.