Legal Opinion

Kidd v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 2007No. 04-CF-1255PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

Appellant, Donte J. Kidd, challenges his conviction on the charge of first-degree premeditated murder while armed. 1 He mainly contends that the trial court’s erroneous aiding and abetting jury instruction violated his constitutional due process right, because under our decision in Wilson-Bey v. United States, 903 A.2d 818 (D.C.2006) (en banc), 2 and other cases, the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the mens rea element of the mur der charge; that is, the government must prove premeditation, deliberation, and the specific intent to kill in an aiding…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lowery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Castillo-Campos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Little v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API