Legal Opinion

Town of Monticello v. Fox

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1891No. 286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the White Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

A demurrer to the second and third paragraphs of the appellant’s answer was sustained j but the appellant was not injured by this action of the court, for the material matters alleged in these paragraphs were admissible in. evidence, and were admitted under the first paragraph of answer, which was the general denial.

The appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and we have examined the evidence.

The facts of the case, stated as briefly as may be, were as follows:

The appellees owned two lots in the town of Monticello, adjoining the western boundary of. the town. A street,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Barton v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. City of Evansville v. DeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Finley v. City of KendallvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Messer v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Wilson v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API